Yes, I am a survivor, for I have managed to survive
all the scary accounts of the Holocaust: the one about the soap (1), the one
about the lamp shades, the one about the camps, the mass shooting, the one
about the gas (2) and the one about the death march (3). I just managed to
survive them all.
In spite of all these fear inflicting stories, that
were purposely installed in my soul since I opened my eyes for the first
time, I have become a functional and even a successful human being. I
somehow survived the horror against all odds. I even manage to love my
neighbour. In spite of all these fearful, traumatic indoctrination I
miraculously managed to master my cheering alto saxophone rather than the
sobbing violin.
In fact, I have already decided that in case the
Queen, or any other member of the Royal Family should ever consider to make
me into a ‘Sir’ for my bebop achievements, or even for facing Zionist
barbarism with my bare pen, I will immediately change my surname from Atzmon
to Vive, just to become the first and only Sir Vive.
I am also totally against Holocaust denial
I clearly resent those who deny the genocides that are
taking place in the name of the Holocaust. Palestine is one example, Iraq is
another and the one that is set for Iran, is probably too scary to
contemplate.
The Holocaust is a relatively new religion (4). It
lacks mercy or compassion, instead it promises revenge through retribution.
For its followers, it is somehow liberating because it allows them to punish
whoever they like as long they gain some pleasure. This may explain why the
Israelis ended up punishing the Palestinians for crimes that were committed
by Europeans. It is rather clear that the newly emerging religion is not
just about ‘eye for an eye’; it is actually an eye for thousands and
thousands of eyes.
A month ago, while visiting in Auschwitz, Israeli
defence minister Ehud Barak left a note in the official visitors book: ‘a
strong Israel is both the comfort and the revenge’(5). No one could
summarise the aspiration of the religion any better. The Holocaust religion
doesn’t offer redemption. It is a crude violent manifestation of sheer
collective brutality. It cannot resolve anything, for aggression can only
lead to more and more aggression. In the Holocaust religion there is neither
room for peace or grace. Take it from Barak, revenge is where they find
comfort.
To deny the danger posed by the Holocaust religion and
its followers is to be complicit in a growing crime against humanity and
against every possible human value.
I am also in total support of the Jewish National
Project
Some believe that after 2000 years of ‘phantasmic
Diaspora’ Jews are indeed entitled to an imaginary ‘national home land of
their own’. The Zionists apparently meant it sincerely. The Jewish state is
now realistic enough to have turned the entire Middle East into a ticking
bomb.
Reviewing the Israeli record of crimes against
humanity in the last six decades doesn’t leave much room for speculation. We
are dealing here with a pathological sinister society. Hence, as much as
some of us may agree that Jews should enjoy a hypothetical right for a land
of their own, planet Earth is certainly not the ideal location for such an
affair.
Hence, I would urge NASA to join in and to make a
special effort to find a suitable alternative planet for the Zionist
homeland in outer space or even in another galaxy. The Galactic Zionist
project would signify the immediate move from ‘promised land’ to ‘promised
planet’. I would enthusiastically stress that rather than searching for ‘a
land with no people for a people with no land’, what we really want is a
‘lonely planet’. It can even be a ‘desert’ for they claim to know how to
make the desert bloom. In a planet of their own the galactic Zionists
wouldn’t need to oppress anyone, they wouldn’t ethnically cleanse either,
they wouldn’t have to lock the indigenous people in concentration camps, for
there won’t be any indigenous people around to abuse, starve, murder and
cleanse. They wouldn’t have to pour white phosphorous over their neighbours
for there won’t be any neighbours. I would highly recommend NASA to search
for a planet with very low gravity just to make it light for people to
wander around. After all, we want the new galactic Zionists to enjoy their
futuristic project as much as the Palestinians and many others may enjoy
their absence.
So here I am, a proper Jew after all: I am a survivor,
I oppose Holocaust denial, I support the Jewish national aspiration. Even
the chief Rabbi of Britain cannot ask for more than that.
(1) Acknowledged recently to be a ‘myth’ by the
Israeli holocaust museum
Yad Vashem
A
box of soap which, according to the
Romanian Jewish community, was made from the bodies of Jews killed in the
Holocaust was found yesterday in a funeral home in Magdiel (part of Hod
Hasharon) in central Israel, Army Radio reported.
|
|
.. |
| The
tombstone in Hod Hasharon, bearing an inscription "Soap of Holy People."
(Nir Keidar) |
The box was buried under a tombstone that read "Soap of Holy People."
Sources at Yad Vashem expressed
disappointment at the radio report, calling the story a "pure invention that
was given a stage by the media."
A Yad Vashem spokeswoman said there is
no proof the Nazis made soap from human bodies during the Holocaust.
The sources said similar claims have
been made in the past regarding soap made from Jewish bodies, including soap
found last year in the Nahariya cemetery. In that case the soap was
determined not to have been made from human remains.
In 1990 samples from several soaps
claimed to have been made from Jews were sent for DNA testing at Tel Aviv
University. Likewise, those tests determined the soaps did not contain human
fats.
(2) A historical "fact" protected by European Law.
(3) A slightly confusing narrative. If the Nazis were
interested in annihilating the entire European Jewish population as
suggested by the orthodox Zionist holocaust narrative, then it is rather
ambiguous as to just what led them to march what was left of European Jewry,
into their crumbling Nazi fatherland at a time when it was clear that they
were losing the war. The two narratives i.e. ‘annihilation’ and ‘death
march’, seem to oppose each other. The issue deserves further elaboration. I
would just suggest that the reasonable answers I have come across may
severely damage the Zionist holocaust narrative.
(4) The Israeli Philosophy professor Yeshayahu
Leibowitz was probably the first to define the holocaust as the ‘new Jewish
religion’.
(5)
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3790707,00.html
