9-11 and Global Warming Hoax As Tools to Expose Propaganda

9-11 and Global Warming Hoax As Tools to Expose Limited Hang-out

As grim as the shocking events of 9-11 seemed, there is a positive side: exposing the institutions and individuals who function as embedded, trusted conduits for the propaganda we’ve all been programmed to call “news.” We get to know them as visitors to our homes in the 6 o’clock news or as commentators in print. They’ve been give platforms and forums with which to convince us that they are the trustworthy authorities we all need. They are the talking heads giving voice to junk science as real science and portraying science as an issue on which scientists can vote.

Along with a skeptical way of thinking, the capacity to analyze information independently, and an understanding of the patterns that have preceded our current events, 9-11 provided us with yet another tool to help us see through the programming that “in-forms”.

Although one lie is enough, as you become aware of enough of the lies, you can begin to see through more and more of the illusions that invade your consciousness. There are so many aspects of the 9-11 crime that have been exposed in the years following that event that you only need to be aware of one or two of the hundreds of bits of evidence and logic that do not fit the Official Conspiracy Theory. For example, jetfuel burning optimally cannot generate enough heat to compromise thick steel girders so that they would UNIFORMLY weaken and collapse straight down at the rate of FREE FALL. It had never happened before 9-11 nor has it happened since then.

Or, when a building is falling, it does not eject huge steel girders laterally. Watching the World Trade Center collapse, the steel ejecta are obvious and to confirm what our eyes show us, steel girders WERE found over 600 feet away from Ground Zero. This does not fit the Official Conspiracy Theory.

Or, when a building falls neatly into its own footprint or when it falls at the rate of free fall – as though there was NOTHING below it to cause any resistance to the fall – this cannot be the result of a top-down collapse triggered by sporadic fires of office furniture and jetfuel. This requires carefully planned demolition. This cannot be explained by the Official Conspiracy Theory.

Or, on 9/11 the U.S. military was running several war exercises, one of which had commercial passenger aircraft slamming into landmark buildings and putting fake blips on FAA screens. Another sent most of the USAF fighter jets to war exercises over Alaska, leaving the Northeastern seaboard unprotected for a few hours…how would bin-Laden know of these war games? How would he know that hijacked aircraft could be flown directly through restricted airspace over several military bases into restricted airspace over Washington D. C. and New York City without opposition?

Or, why would the NY Port Authority contaminate the Ground Zero crime scene by removing the WTC steel superstructure and shipping it to Asian steel mills to be melted down before it could be thoroughly examined by forensic metallurgists? In fact, why was the FEMA team sent to NYC the day before 9/11 so it could be in place to control the crime scene…just a lucky guess by somebody? Don’t criminals normally reveal their guilt by trying to get rid of evidence? Was bin Laden consulting with Mayor Giuliani’s office and the New York Port Authority?

Or, why has the FBI confiscated the surveillance tapes from all locations around the Pentagon and not release them to the public, even eight years later? Does al-Qaeda consult with the FBI, too? What is on those tapes that we should not see? Did bin-Laden have THAT planned, too?
The morning after 9-11 some of the “hijackers” woke up to see their photos and names plastered all over the world news, even in Saudi Arabia.
• "Mr Al-Hazmi is 26 and had just returned to work at a petrochemical complex in the industrial eastern city of Yanbo after a holiday in Saudi Arabia when the hijackers struck. He was accused of hijacking the American Airlines Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon." Telegraph UK - 9/23/01
• "...another suspect, Khalid Al-Mihdhar, may also be alive." BBC, 23rd September 2001.
• On Sept. 22, Associated Press reported that Al-Shehri had spoken to the U.S. embassy in Morocco. "He acknowledges that he attended flight training school at Dayton Beach in the United States, and is indeed the same Waleed Al -Shehri to whom the FBI has been referring. But, he says, he left the United States in September last year [2000], became a pilot with Saudi Arabian airlines and is currently on a further training course in Morocco." BBC - 9/23/01 * allafrica.com - 9/24/01
• "A Saudi man has reported to authorities that he is the real Abdul Aziz Al-Omari, and claims his passport was stolen in 1995 while he studied electrical engineering at the University of Denver. Al-Omari says he informed police of the theft." - ABCNews
• "I couldn't believe it when the FBI put me on their list. They gave my name and my date of birth, but I am not a suicide bomber. I am here. I am alive. I have no idea how to fly a plane. I had nothing to do with this." - Telegraph 23rd September 2001
• Saeed Alghamdi said, “I was completely shocked. For the past 10 months I have been based in Tunis with 22 other pilots learning to fly an Airbus 320. The FBI provided no evidence of my presumed involvement in the attacks." - Telegraph 23rd September 2001
• Ahmed Alnami “"I'm still alive, as you can see. I was shocked to see my name mentioned by the American Justice Department. He had never lost his passport and found it "very worrying" that his identity appeared to have been "stolen" and published by the FBI without any checks. The FBI had said his "possible residence" was Delray Beach in Florida. " Telegraph UK, 23rd September
Even the FBI says there is no evidence to link the above men to the 9/11 hijackings

We are told that the group that planned and carried out the hijackings and subsequent attack on the World Trade Towers were highly trained (possibly by the CIA) experts, with knowledge of how to steal identities, forge fake IDs, and compromise White House and Air Force One security codes. Yet at the same time, we are being told that these same hijackers spent the night before the attack getting drunk in bars, making noise, screaming insults at the "infidels", and doing everything they could to attract attention to themselves. They used the credit cards issued in their stolen names, allowed their driver's licenses with the stolen names to be photocopied, and used public library computers to send emails back and forth using their stolen names signed to unencrypted messages about their plans to steal aircraft and crash them into buildings, then decorated their apartments with absurdly obvious props such as a crop dusting manual to the point where the whole affair reads like a low budget "B" detective movie from the 1930s.

In short, these men did everything they could to make sure everyone knew who they were, or more to the point, who they were pretending to be.

Because the IDs used by the hijackers were phony, we cannot know who they really were or who they really worked for. But what is apparent is that those who planned the hijackings and the 9/11 attacks went out of their way to leave plenty of clues pointing to citizens of middle eastern Arab nations.

We don't know who planned 9/11 attacks.

But we do know who they wanted us to think they were.

We do know who they intended America to blame for the attacks.

This and much more was known within a year of the 9-11 attack. Journalists have had plenty of time to absorb the obvious…the Official Conspiracy Theory does not fit the facts. Therefore those journalists who write as though 19 Arab men hijacked four commercial passenger aircraft nearly simultaneously, flew them through restricted airspace without interception, piloted heavy aircraft hundreds of nautical miles to their targets, flew the heavies beyond the limits programmed into their flight management control computers, slammed into big buildings, burned in intense fires, were crushed in the collapse of the buildings … and got up the next morning to complain of their photos and names connected to the criminal mayhem on 9/11….either such journalists are VERY stupid, VERY careless, or have been co-opted to tell only part of the truth and be ready to tell whatever lie is required of them. That’s a limited hangout. So who can you trust? Read what the journalists have written about 9/11 and you’ll have an immediate litmus test of their intellectual and moral honesty.

You can look at the statements of such celebrated men as Noam Chomsky and Seymour Hersh, and such groups such as AlterNet and Op-Ed News to see how they do the limited hang-out, exposing some lies but touting the Globalist party line on other lies. These are the gatekeepers of the left. Of course, the right also has its gatekeepers, a lot of them. Both sides play a game to crunch the public from the left and from the right, convincing us that we should follow the lead of one faction of another, always keeping us off-balance, misinformed, and programmed to think that we can choose sides, elect politicians and all will be well with the American body politic.

You can do the same with Global Warming, now that the whistle has been blown. In late November 2009 an anonymous whistle blower inside the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, or less likely a hacker, released thousands of emails and other documents to a world that had been stonewalled for over a decade. Many of those “scientists” still working with the UN’s Intergovernmental Policy on Climate Control process were shown by their own words to be manipulating data, destroying original raw data, destroying emails and urging others to do the same, rigging the peer-review process so that their papers would be accepted, and they prevented peer-review and publication of papers of established scientists around the world who had contrary data and analyses. Even their own computer models are rife with programmer’s commentary about tricking the data so that it would provide the graphs from which they could make their claims. Much of the data on which a case was assembled for Man-caused Global Warming is thus contaminated and invalid. The entire case falls apart because the entire IPCC process has been jerry-rigged to produce the graphs to fit the pre-conceived plan.

With this basic information you can look at the speeches or writings of any politician, scientist, or journalist and determine the level of trust that they deserve. Like 9-11, Global Warming provides another device that you can use as a crap-detector.

Al Gore, Ed Begley Jr., David Suzuki, David Attenborough, groups such as World Wildlife Watch, Greenpeace, National Geographic and many more are now being exposed as purveyors of the environmental lie of Global Warming.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.